Home / Blog / Wearables may be accurate enough to save lives

Wearables may be accurate enough to save lives

The Apple watch can detect atrial fibrillation and make you aware that a check with a doctor is in order. Image credit: Slash Gear

Just two years ago I was at a conference discussing the value of wearable as medical devices. The general mood among practitioners was that their accuracy was too low and too dependent on the way they were used to take the data generated into any consideration.

The situation, however, seems to be different today.

A study, just published by Stanford -on March 16th, 2019-, reports on results obtained by having 400,000 people across 50 US states using the Apple watch for over a year, since November 2017. They were required to wear an Apple watch (series 1, 2, 3 – series 4 was not available at the time of the study) and an iPhone.

Over this period Stanford researchers detected notifications of potential atrial fibrillation to just 0.5% of users (that is around 2,000 notifications). This relatively low number is important because you do not want to cry wolf and then discover there is nothing to cry about. Do that a few time and when there will be a reason no one will take notice.

Actually, the study found that 84% of those who received a notification did have an atrial fibrillation at the time of the warning. Notable, 34% of those who received a notification of irregular pulse and who took an ECG a week later were found to have atrial fibrillation. This is a significant number given that atrial fibrillation is an intermittent condition that may not be manifest if you take an ECG after some time.

It should also be noted that only 57% of those who received an alert notification sought medical advice. It is not 100% but it is still a significant number. It shows that people are not used to receive these types of alert and downplay their relevance.  Over time it is likely that trust on these devices will increase and with it an appropriate response to those notification will be taken,

It is not just about atrial fibrillation. Wearables have the potential to detect a number of other situations requiring medical attention. Most of these are intermittent in nature and difficult to detect in a periodical screening. Having the possibility to be alerted and to show the notification to your doctor may trigger more in depth analyses and eventually save lives.

The lower accuracy of wearable (as I mentioned in most cases the lower accuracy is not an issue of the device, rather the result of its improper use) is counterbalanced by the extensive time the wearable has to monitor us. Over this time spikes and errors can be evened out and intermittent situations may be detected.  Accuracy will result from the many measures taken, rather than from the accuracy of a single measure.

Apple is clearly betting on the value of wearable and this study is supporting that.

In the next decade I am pretty sure that having a monitoring device on us, most of the time, will become normal, and I expect the avalanche of data that will become available will trigger the development of many applications that will change the way we look at healthcare.

About Roberto Saracco

Roberto Saracco fell in love with technology and its implications long time ago. His background is in math and computer science. Until April 2017 he led the EIT Digital Italian Node and then was head of the Industrial Doctoral School of EIT Digital up to September 2018. Previously, up to December 2011 he was the Director of the Telecom Italia Future Centre in Venice, looking at the interplay of technology evolution, economics and society. At the turn of the century he led a World Bank-Infodev project to stimulate entrepreneurship in Latin America. He is a senior member of IEEE where he leads the Industry Advisory Board within the Future Directions Committee and co-chairs the Digital Reality Initiative. He teaches a Master course on Technology Forecasting and Market impact at the University of Trento. He has published over 100 papers in journals and magazines and 14 books.

One comment

  1. Just read this news on the web:

    “Posted to Reddit by “ClockworkWVVII” with the title “My Apple Watch just saved my life,” the Redditor explains they received a high heart rate notification while relaxing in bed. The user then contacted the emergency services for medical assistance, as a preventative measure.

    The paramedics arrived to find the user in “serious trouble,” with their body described as having gone “into shock.” The poster was put onto a stretcher and taken to the trauma center of the local hospital. ”

    https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/04/08/apple-watchs-heart-rate-monitoring-credited-with-saving-another-life?utm_source=Daily+Email&utm_campaign=bca9826b18-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_04_08_02_42&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_03a4a88021-bca9826b18-248625753

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *